TODAY IN NUMBERS
SCIENCE · SATIRE · THRESHOLD REASONING

LHCb Finds Evidence for a Decay That Happens Once in Ten Billion Times, Which Leaves It Officially Provisional

Forty years of searching have produced a 3.2-sigma signal for a B-zero meson decaying into two muons. Three sigma counts as evidence in particle physics; five is required for a discovery.

Physicists on the LHCb experiment at CERN's Large Hadron Collider have reported the first single-experiment evidence for one of the rarest processes the Standard Model predicts: a B-zero meson, made of a beauty quark and a down antiquark, decaying into a pair of muons.

The decay is expected to occur about once in every 10 billion decays of beauty particles. CERN announced the result in a release republished by ScienceDaily.

The analysis was co-led by Marco Santimaria, one of 19 scientists on the international team. "Physicists have been chasing this decay for more than forty years," he said.

The signal reaches 3.0 standard deviations using data collected in 2024 and 2025. Combined with data taken between 2011 and 2018, it rises to 3.2 standard deviations. In particle physics 3 sigma counts as evidence, while a confirmed observation requires 5, which this result does not reach.

"Seeing evidence of this rare decay is incredibly exciting," said Harry Cliff, LHCb's Rare Decays Convener and an analysis co-lead.

The equivalent decay of the B-sub-s meson, which is about 30 times more common at roughly three occurrences per billion, was observed in 2015 in a joint analysis by LHCb and CMS, published in Nature.

LHCb was upgraded and began collecting data again in 2024 at five times the rate of its 2010 to 2018 run. Machine learning was used to separate the signal from the background.

Both decays are stringent tests of the Standard Model, because a measured rate differing from the prediction would be indirect evidence of particles the theory does not contain. CERN says the results agree with predictions from the Standard Model.

The thresholds are where this becomes interesting. At 3.2 sigma the decay has been judged to exist as evidence but not as an observation, which gives it a standing the rest of physics does not have to manage: it happens, provisionally.

The rarity makes that provisional state durable. A process occurring once in ten billion decays cannot be confirmed any faster than the collider can produce ten billion decays, so promotion from evidence to discovery is a question of statistics rather than of nature. Nature settled it long before anybody was looking.

There is a further awkwardness. The measured rate agrees with the Standard Model, which is the theory that predicted the decay in the first place. Forty years of searching have therefore established that the prediction was correct, which is what the prediction said.

Our analysts note the practical implication for the other 9,999,999,999 decays. In every one of them the B-zero meson does something else, and does it reliably, which makes the paper's most dependable finding the one it does not report.

The Department of Unnecessary Research has filed the result under provisional existence and recommends no further action until five sigma. Until then the decay occupies the position of a thing seen often enough to be announced and not often enough to have happened.

EVIDENCE, NOT YET DISCOVERYQUESTIONABLE ANALYTICS
602024-25 data
64With 2011-18 data
100Discovery level
Normalised 0-100 for display; the real values are 3.0 and 3.2 standard deviations against the 5-sigma discovery threshold.
THE BORING FACT

The LHCb collaboration at CERN has reported evidence for the decay of a B-zero meson into two muons, a process expected about once in every 10 billion beauty-particle decays, at a significance of 3.0 standard deviations from 2024-2025 data and 3.2 when combined with data from 2011 to 2018. Three sigma counts as evidence; a confirmed observation requires five.

Source: ScienceDaily
OUR PROFESSIONAL CONCLUSION

Because 3 sigma counts as evidence and 5 as discovery, a decay that occurs once in ten billion times exists provisionally until the collider has produced enough of them, which makes its existence a matter of statistics rather than of nature.

REALITY CHECK · THRESHOLD REASONING

Unfortunately, there's a small problem.

Sigma thresholds describe confidence in a measurement, not whether a process occurs: the decay either happens at the predicted rate or it does not, and more data only sharpens the estimate. Treating a statistical convention as a condition of existence is the trick.

THE BS DETECTOR

Where did reality end?

Tap the paragraph where this story stopped being true. Then see where everyone else bailed.

 

READER CREDULITY METER

Did you believe this story before the twist?

Be the first reader to answer.

YOU WRITE THE CONCLUSION

Think you can end this story better than our analysts?

One deadpan conclusion, 280 characters at most. Start from the facts above and take them one step too far. Our editor picks the best one each morning, and it runs in the next edition.

280 left
No real people's private lives, no tragedy, nothing that accuses anyone of anything. Our editor reads every entry and prints one; the rest are never published.