TODAY IN NUMBERS
WORLD · SATIRE · CATEGORY ERROR

Bolivia's New Wild Cat Has Been There for 1.4 Million Years and Became a Species on Thursday

Leopardus tilcayo is the first living feline to be formally named and described in more than a century. Nothing in the cloud forest has changed.

Editorial cartoon illustration: A very small light-brown wild cat with dark rosettes sits calmly on a wooden table in a misty cloud-forest research station in Bolivia, with ferns and low cloud visible through an open doorway. Three biologists in field clothing lean in around the table, one measuring the cat with callipers and two simply watching. A fourth biologist stands slightly apart, holding a large empty gilded picture frame up around the cat as though presenting it.
Editorial illustration by The Questionable Times. Based on the verified event; scene is illustrative.

A diminutive wild cat that inhabits Bolivia's cloud forest has been identified as a previously unknown species, marking the first time a new living feline species has been formally named and described in more than a century.

The animal, called tilcayo by local communities, belongs to a group known as tiger cats found across much of South America. It was found in Bolivia's Yungas forest, a mountainous region where forests are often covered by clouds and surrounded by high humidity. It measures about 18in (46cm) long and weighs about 3lb (1.4kg), making it smaller than the average domestic cat.

Researchers used genetic data to confirm that the cat is a new species and gave it the scientific name Leopardus tilcayo, retaining its local name. The study describing it was published on Thursday in the journal Current Biology.

"Its fur is light brown ... with irregularly shaped rosettes across its body," said Paola Nogales-Ascarrunz, a National Geographic explorer and one of the authors of the study.

Little is yet known about the animal's biology or lifestyle. Remains of small rodents in scat samples suggest they may form part of its diet, while camera-trap evidence indicates it could be more active at night.

Tiger cats are what biologists call cryptic species, meaning they cannot easily be distinguished merely by appearance, said Jonas Lescroart, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Antwerp in Belgium and a co-lead author. Tiger cats were previously considered a single species, although genetic studies decades ago suggested there were several.

The team analysed DNA from 38 cats sampled across several South American countries, including eight museum specimens, and concluded that tiger cats are in fact five genetically distinct species.

"We never expected this Bolivian tiger cat to be a separate species, and no one had ever proposed it as a different animal, subspecies or otherwise," Lescroart said. The team looked in the first place because, as Nogales-Ascarrunz put it, "its characteristics did not match the descriptions, most of them based on Brazilian cats".

Genetic analysis suggested that the tilcayo lineage separated from other tiger cats about 1.4 million years ago. "The more differences in their DNA, the longer the time that we estimate those lineages to have been physically separated," Lescroart said, adding that such a gap is generally considered a species-level divide in cats.

The same research also described a new tiger cat subspecies in Peru's Yungas region, named Leopardus tigrinus antisuyo after Antisuyu, the region of the old Inca empire that included the area it inhabits. The International Union for Conservation of Nature currently treats tiger cats as two "vulnerable" species with declining populations, and its upcoming review will assess the five lineages separately.

That matters because the Yungas is under pressure from deforestation, agricultural expansion, fires and mining. "There are many undiscovered species out there in the world, and they are at risk of disappearing before we even discover them," said Eduardo Eizirik of the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, the study's senior author.

It is worth being precise about what happened on Thursday. The number of tiger cat species rose from one to five. The number of tiger cats did not change. No animal was born, moved or altered. The forest was not consulted.

This newspaper considers it an efficient piece of conservation. Four species were created at no cost to the habitat, using only existing animals and a journal.

The eight museum specimens are the clearest illustration. Several of them have been in storage for a long time, and for the whole of that period they have been the wrong species. They achieved this without moving.

The conservation bookkeeping now follows. The IUCN has five lineages to assess where it previously had two species. Four of those lineages are a few days old. One of them is 1.4 million years old. They are the same cats.

A 10-year-old male at the Senda Verde wildlife sanctuary has therefore spent his entire life as a member of a species that was described on Thursday. He is, by a comfortable margin, its oldest member.

HOW MANY TIGER CAT SPECIES EXISTQUESTIONABLE ANALYTICS
20Recognised before the study
100Recognised after it
100Alive in the forest, either way
Illustrative newsroom graphic on a 0-100 scale: one recognised species became five. The number of animals in the forest did not change.
THE BORING FACT

A small wild cat living in Bolivia's Yungas cloud forest has been identified as a previously unknown species and named Leopardus tilcayo, the first time a new living feline species has been formally named and described in more than a century. Genetic analysis suggests its lineage separated from other tiger cats about 1.4 million years ago.

Source: The Guardian
OUR PROFESSIONAL CONCLUSION

Because a species begins when it is described, the tilcayo spent 1.4 million years not being anything, and four new species were created without a single new animal.

REALITY CHECK · CATEGORY ERROR

Unfortunately, there's a small problem.

Naming and describing a species records what already exists; it does not bring it into being. The discovery is a change in human knowledge, not in the animals, and the IUCN reassessment matters because the real populations may be smaller than a single combined listing suggested.

THE BS DETECTOR

Where did reality end?

Tap the paragraph where this story stopped being true. Then see where everyone else bailed.

 

READER CREDULITY METER

Did you believe this story before the twist?

Be the first reader to answer.