TODAY IN NUMBERS
SPORT · SATIRE · PROXY SUBSTITUTION

Daicos Wins the Brownlow With 47 Votes, 39 of Them From Thirteen Afternoons

The Collingwood midfielder broke Patrick Cripps's record of 45 votes. He polled the maximum three votes in thirteen separate matches.

Editorial cartoon illustration: A young Australian rules footballer in a striped guernsey sits at a long white-clothed table in a formal awards room with a medal around his neck, surrounded by seated guests in evening dress applauding him. At the side of the room three umpires in bright shirts stand close together in a huddle, and one of them is holding a small metal tally counter in his fist.
Editorial illustration by The Questionable Times. Based on the verified event; scene is illustrative.

Nick Daicos has won his first Brownlow Medal with 47 votes, breaking the record of 45 set by Carlton's Patrick Cripps in 2024 and becoming Collingwood's first winner of the award since Dane Swan in 2011.

Daicos, 23, finished eleven votes clear of Geelong's Bailey Smith on 36. Marcus Bontempelli of the Western Bulldogs polled 34, Melbourne's Max Gawn 28, and Brisbane's Will Ashcroft, Cripps and North Melbourne's Harry Sheezel were level on 27.

The season behind the total was a consistent one. Daicos averaged 34.9 disposals, 5.7 clearances, 6.7 inside-50s and 1.1 goals a game.

He began by polling nine votes from his first three matches, the maximum available, and led the count from round 11 onwards. Between rounds 15 and 20 he was judged the best player on the ground six weeks running.

It was his fourth consecutive year as the pre-count favourite, and the first time the favourite's tag held.

"I've just learned not to trust the betting markets, to be honest," Daicos said afterwards. "There is relief. It's a massive award."

The Brownlow is decided by umpires, who award three, two and one vote to the players they judge best afield in each home-and-away match. A record in that system is a record in a particular kind of arithmetic.

Daicos polled the maximum three votes in thirteen matches. That is 39 votes. The remaining eight came from everything else he did all season.

The distribution deserves attention, because it tells you what the medal actually counts. Roughly five-sixths of the record-breaking total was earned on thirteen afternoons. The rest of the year contributed less than the first three weeks of it.

This is not a criticism of the player, whose disposal average did not fluctuate. It is an observation about the instrument. A three-two-one ballot does not measure how well a footballer played. It measures how often he was the most conspicuous person on the field at the moment somebody was asked.

On that measure the record is unambiguous. Thirteen times this season, the umpires were invited to name the best player on the ground, and thirteen times they could not think of anyone else.

The six consecutive best-afield performances between rounds 15 and 20 are the strongest evidence. For six weeks, in six different stadiums, against six different opponents, the question was put and the answer did not change.

The Department of Unnecessary Research notes that the record now stands at 47 and that the previous holder, on 45, finished this season on 27. It concludes that the Brownlow Medal is not an award for the best footballer in Australia but a survey with a very small sample and an exceptionally consistent respondent, and that Nick Daicos has won it by being the easiest answer available.

THE RECORD, IN VOTESQUESTIONABLE ANALYTICS
100Daicos 2026
96Cripps 2024
77Smith 2026
72Bontempelli 2026
Real vote totals scaled so the winner is 100: Daicos 47, Cripps's previous record 45, Bailey Smith 36, Marcus Bontempelli 34.
THE BORING FACT

Nick Daicos of Collingwood won the 2026 Brownlow Medal with 47 votes, breaking the record of 45 set by Patrick Cripps in 2024, and polled the maximum three votes in thirteen matches.

Source: ABC News
OUR PROFESSIONAL CONCLUSION

Because 39 of Daicos's 47 votes came from thirteen matches, the record measures the number of afternoons on which umpires could not think of anyone else, making the Brownlow a survey rather than an award.

REALITY CHECK · PROXY SUBSTITUTION

Unfortunately, there's a small problem.

Polling maximum votes thirteen times is evidence of sustained dominance, not of a flaw in the count: a player has to be best afield to be named best afield. Reframing a judged award as a survey confuses the method of recording an assessment with the assessment itself.

THE BS DETECTOR

Where did reality end?

Tap the paragraph where this story stopped being true. Then see where everyone else bailed.

 

READER CREDULITY METER

Did you believe this story before the twist?

Be the first reader to answer.