TODAY IN NUMBERS
SCIENCE · SATIRE · LABEL PERSISTENCE

Roman Coffin at Westminster Abbey Is Inscribed to Valerius Amandinus and Contains an Eleventh-Century Abbot

Radiocarbon dating puts the skeleton inside the fourth-century sarcophagus some six centuries after the man named on it. The lid was recut with an Anglo-Saxon cross and later used as a floor slab.

Editorial cartoon illustration: A long stone sarcophagus with its heavy carved lid propped against its side stands in a bright stone-vaulted gallery inside an English abbey, a skeleton laid out neatly inside it. Three archaeologists in cotton gloves and plain work clothes stand around the coffin, two of them looking down into it with their hands behind their backs. On a low plinth at the head of the coffin, a small Roman marble bust of a man has been set facing the wall.
Editorial illustration by The Questionable Times. Based on the verified event; scene is illustrative.

A limestone sarcophagus of the late Roman period, carrying a Latin inscription to a man named Valerius Amandinus, holds the skeleton of somebody who died roughly six hundred years after him.

The identification is set out by Prof Warwick Rodwell, consultant archaeologist at Westminster Abbey, in the Journal of the British Archaeological Association, and was reported by the Guardian on Wednesday.

The coffin was first noticed in 1820 and officially excavated in 1869, from what is now a strip of grass along the north side of the abbey's nave and was once the yard of a sacristy built by Henry III. Whose remains it held has been an open question ever since.

The sarcophagus itself is unambiguously late Roman, with the inscription and Roman decoration on one side. No Roman artefacts turned up in subsequent excavations of the surrounding ground. "That was not its original place of burial," Rodwell said, suggesting the coffin was first housed in the wall recess of a mausoleum, and that Valerius Amandinus was a wealthy individual.

The lid of the fourth-century coffin carries a large carved cross that was later shown to be a modification of the original. "It runs the full length and the width of the lid, and it's a very specific late Anglo-Saxon cross type," Rodwell said.

The paper describes a fresh investigation carried out in 2018, when the sarcophagus was taken to a laboratory as part of plans to display it in the Queen's Diamond Jubilee Galleries, and its lid removed. "And there, inside it, was the skeleton," Rodwell said. Written records had suggested the bones were lost; they tallied with those shown in 19th-century drawings.

Analysis put the remains at a man of 5ft 9in, aged between 35 and 49. Cleaning the interior revealed a rectangular outline in a white substance on the floor of the coffin, which Rodwell reads as a body covered in powdered lime and placed in a wooden coffin that then sat inside the stone one.

Radiocarbon dating settled the chronology: the bones belong to the late 10th or early 11th century. "Nobody of lower rank would have been buried in anything like that," Rodwell said, adding that the recut lid pointed the same way. "The Latin cross again points to a major ecclesiastic."

Two abbots fit. Ælfwig died in about 1020 and Wulfnoth in about 1049. Rodwell favours Ælfwig, who was already a monk at Westminster when the previous abbot died and who spent about 27 years in the role.

The re-used coffin was most likely interred in the eastern arm of the abbey church, Rodwell suggests, with its lid serving as a floor slab, before being dug up and reburied during Henry III's building works. "It's like so much in archaeology," he said. "There's a lot more complication than one initially sees."

One detail has gone unaddressed. The inscription has not been corrected. It still names Valerius Amandinus, and it remains the only name the object carries.

On the evidence of the lettering, which is by six hundred years the oldest surviving documentation in the case, the Abbot of Westminster who died in about 1020 was a wealthy late-Roman gentleman whose coffin was subsequently recut, repurposed and walked on.

The arithmetic of the object is tidier than the arithmetic of the men inside it. One label. Two tenancies. Neither occupant currently in residence. The lid alone has held three posts: a lid, a cross and a floor.

The Department of Unnecessary Research regards this as the correct way to run a burial ground. A coffin that survives six centuries between occupants is not a grave but reusable plant, and a name carved into reusable plant is a registration rather than an identification.

Westminster Abbey has now resolved who is inside. The sarcophagus continues to say otherwise, and it was there first.

ONE COFFIN, FOUR CENTURIES APARTQUESTIONABLE ANALYTICS
0Coffin cut, 4th c.
45Reburial, c.1020
85Excavated, 1869
100Lid removed, 2018
Illustrative newsroom graphic: positions on a timeline, not measured quantities.
THE BORING FACT

Prof Warwick Rodwell, consultant archaeologist at Westminster Abbey, reports in the Journal of the British Archaeological Association that the skeleton found inside a late Roman sarcophagus inscribed to Valerius Amandinus is most likely a medieval abbot, after radiocarbon dating placed the bones in the late 10th or early 11th century.

Source: The Guardian
OUR PROFESSIONAL CONCLUSION

Because the inscription naming Valerius Amandinus was never altered and is by six centuries the oldest record in the case, the coffin's own documentation turns an eleventh-century abbot into a wealthy late-Roman gentleman, and the coffin itself into reusable plant with a registration carved on it.

REALITY CHECK · LABEL PERSISTENCE

Unfortunately, there's a small problem.

An inscription records who commissioned or was commemorated by an object, not who was later placed inside it, and the re-use of Roman sarcophagi in Anglo-Saxon and Norman England is well attested. The radiocarbon date identifies the occupant; the inscription identifies the coffin.

THE BS DETECTOR

Where did reality end?

Tap the paragraph where this story stopped being true. Then see where everyone else bailed.

 

READER CREDULITY METER

Did you believe this story before the twist?

Be the first reader to answer.