TODAY IN NUMBERS
WEATHER · SATIRE · OBSERVER EFFECT

Washington Farm Cuts Watering From Four Times a Week to Three Times a Summer, by Looking

Soil moisture sensors told the Outback Farm what its ground already held. Nothing else about the field changed.

Editorial cartoon illustration: A small university vegetable farm in Washington State on an overcast morning, rows of leafy greens running towards a line of fir trees. A farmer in a waterproof jacket kneels in the soil holding a small muddy sensor up to her ear, as though listening to a seashell. Behind her a coiled irrigation hose lies unused on the grass while two students carry crates of vegetables.
Editorial illustration by The Questionable Times. Based on the verified event; scene is illustrative.

A university farm in the Pacific Northwest has cut its summer irrigation from roughly four waterings a week to three in the entire season, after burying sensors in its soil.

The Outback Farm at Western Washington University grows vegetables in a region outsiders tend to picture as permanently damp. In fact most of its rain falls in winter, and Terri Kempton of the farm says that pattern is becoming less reliable.

"So instead of the kind of constant drizzle, very light rain through all of the months of winter, we're seeing a big storm, a lot of water running off, flooding, and then there's just a dry period while we wait for another big storm," she said.

Summers, meanwhile, are getting hotter and drier. The combination makes it hard for growers to judge when a field actually needs water, as distinct from when it looks as though it might.

Two years ago the farm put soil moisture sensors into some of its fields.

"So then I'm not left guessing like, well, it did rain yesterday, but did it go deep enough to matter to the plant roots?" Kempton said. "I don't have to dig a hole and stick my hand in it. I can just, like, boop, read the little sensor that's already buried underground and it will tell me."

The farm then watered only when the sensors said watering was needed. "So that saves time, and of course it saves water, a lot of water," she said.

It is worth listing what changed at the Outback Farm and what did not. The crops did not change. The soil did not change. The weather did not change. The irrigation system did not change.

A small object was buried in the ground, and the farm's water requirement collapsed.

This newspaper draws the available conclusion. The farm did not reduce its need for water. It established that the need had not been there.

The water was already in the ground, at root depth, where it had been the whole time. What the field was short of was not rain. It was an opinion about rain.

The Department of Unnecessary Research has put the natural follow-up question, which is what share of any given drought consists of not having looked. The department accepts that this is not how droughts work and would like the sensors checked anyway.

Before the sensors, four waterings a week. After them, three all summer. The rain had always gone deep enough. Nobody had asked it.

WATERINGS BEFORE AND AFTER THE SENSORSQUESTIONABLE ANALYTICS
4Before, per week
3After, per summer
The two bars count different periods: about four waterings in a typical week before the sensors, three in the whole summer afterwards.
THE BORING FACT

Outback Farm at Western Washington University buried soil moisture sensors in some of its fields two years ago and, by watering only when the sensors showed it was needed, went from watering about four times a week to three times in the whole summer, Terri Kempton of the farm told Yale Climate Connections.

Source: Yale Climate Connections
OUR PROFESSIONAL CONCLUSION

Since nothing in the field changed except that somebody was finally measuring it, the farm did not save water so much as discover the water had been there all along.

REALITY CHECK · OBSERVER EFFECT

Unfortunately, there's a small problem.

A sensor changes what the farmer knows, not what the field holds; the saving comes from ending unnecessary watering, which is a decision. The headline comparison also sets a weekly rate against a whole season's total.

THE BS DETECTOR

Where did reality end?

Tap the paragraph where this story stopped being true. Then see where everyone else bailed.

 

READER CREDULITY METER

Did you believe this story before the twist?

Be the first reader to answer.